“My life-long search for this digestible explanation is finally coming to a place where I can see a path to connecting with God.”
— Malene McMahon
The investigation in Infinitely Simple: The Foundation is not new. The same structure has been glimpsed, named, and handed forward in every era by careful observers working from incompatible assumptions in incompatible languages — each taking it further than the last, each setting it down before the work was complete. What is new is the language precise enough to describe it without distorting it, and the logical nuance that prevents the misreadings that followed every previous version. This is where it was picked up next.
Left no framework, only a method — questioning every assumption until only what cannot be coherently denied remains. He cleared the ground others would build on. The Method & First Principles →
His Theory of Forms is the first rigorous attempt to name the Logos — eternal patterns of which material things are local, derivative expressions: macrocosm and microcosm in pre-scientific language. What he could not say is why the Forms produce particulars at all. Plato & the Forms →
His Unmoved Mover maps almost directly onto the uncaused first cause the book derives, and his hylomorphism anticipates the active-passive structure. He could not resolve why a self-contemplating ground would produce anything but itself. Aristotle & the First Cause →
The closest the ancient world came to the three-level structure — the One, the Nous (Logos), and Soul — with emanation as eternal logical expression, not a choice made in time. He had the architecture, but no precise vocabulary and no evidence. Plotinus & Emanation →
His distinction between the Godhead — the unknowable ground — and God in relational expression anticipates the relationship the book formalizes. He could describe the experience but not derive it, and was condemned for exactly the misreading the book’s logic exists to prevent. The Mystics & the Ground →
A judge who brought legal precision to the mind, naming the active-passive polarity as a structural fact, not a moral hierarchy. A devout, orthodox Christian — not the pantheist or “law of attraction” figure later movements made of him. Troward & Mental Science →
Built what Troward pointed toward: a structured weekly discipline of inward attention. The Application Manual stands in direct lineage from his Master Key System — one capacity per week, seated, timer set — but with the framework derived underneath it. Haanel & the Master Key →
The father of American psychology, who took inner experience seriously as data and called Troward’s Edinburgh Lectures the ablest statement of philosophy he had met — yet never committed to where the evidence led. Consciousness Research →
Described microcosm and macrocosm in psychological language — archetypes as shared patterns expressing through individual psyches, the Self larger than the ego. He avoided metaphysics, which protected him professionally but stopped the logic short. Jung & the Archetypes →
A Jesuit paleontologist who saw evolution as the complexification of consciousness toward an Omega Point — the three-level structure seen from inside the evolutionary process. Suppressed in his lifetime for looking, to those who hadn’t followed the argument, like pantheism. Consciousness & Evolution →
The same structure that Plato named the Forms, Aristotle the Unmoved Mover, Plotinus the One, Eckhart the Godhead, Troward the Universal Mind, and Jung the collective unconscious is now being approached from inside six independent scientific disciplines — quantum foundations, consciousness research, systems biology, philosophy of mind, cosmological fine-tuning, and mathematics — that have no knowledge of one another’s findings, yet each arrive at the same structural limit. See the six convergences →
Infinitely Simple: The Foundation is where those lines meet — not a synthesis from the outside, but the derivation from first principles that shows why they converge, what they converge on, and what it means for anyone who wants to do more than understand it intellectually.
The next volume in the series turns from the ground to the creature standing on it — and to what it looks like, in practice, when the framework is no longer merely understood but lived. That work is forthcoming.
Picked up where the last careful observers set it down, and carried further. Available now.
Order the Books →